Maybe you can straighten it out.
Why do you change the hard words to a softer word when it comes to Sodomites?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/15/2005 12:48:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bill Taylor quoted John:
>Well, for one thing, it does not include the
>lesbian side of the circumstance nor does it
>apply to a hugh population of gay types.
>Many do not practice sodomy.
I thought he was trying to say that there are many homosexuals who had not
yet experienced anal sex, but perhaps only oral sex or some other of their
various perversions. John is sometimes very difficult to understand. I
still think he has been tainted by the homosexual agenda and their lies.
Just the use of the word "gay" tells me that, and the use of the phrase "gay
types" tells even more.
It might be time for you to retire from the "prophet" business. You have expressed a personal judgment about me, and then offered a pretense for that determination. Very sad.
JD
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
