*note Subject Change Subject was "Cult behavior" and now is "Bible Translations"
Kevin wrote: > Whats the difference David? No difference in > all the "revisions" God does not use a Xerox > machine as you suppose He does. Kevin, we had a major disconnect in our communication. I consulted some dictionaries to understand the word heresy used in the KJV and you claimed that I had changed the PURE words of God after I shared what the dictionaries said about this word. So I asked you the following: David Miller wrote: > Please define "PURE words of God." > Is the King James Version the PURE words > of God? If so, which version? Did you change > the PURE words of God when you wrote above > "Damnable heresy" instead of "damnable heresies"? You responded: Kevin wrote: > Pure word of God is what I hold > in my hands. AV1611 That AV1611 sounds rather strange to me, so I raised many questions. Now, based upon your answers, it sounds to me like you are not holding the AV1611 in your hands. Were you speaking metaphorically or something? I took you quite literally. We are probably pretty close to the same page on this one. I too favor the Majority Text tradition, but there are still issues to discuss. You seem to think that any Greek consultation is futile, yet that is exactly what the Majority Text tradition does. How about first telling me whether you read the AV1611 or the AV1769 version. Then I may pick up some other issues when I have time. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
