My view is a very commonly held view.That makes it true.
YOU MUST HAVE MISREAD THIS the movement was founded in the late 1800's KJ was dead by then!
The Fudamentalist Movement was founded by Baptists Presbyterians &Methodists. This is not true, either. You forget that King James 1 was an "Evangelical Christian"
So you use the merit legalist definition. Might as well apply it to me since you can't get the Baptist portion correct either. You are not trying to frame my beliefs you are throwing mud against the wall to see what sticks.
Not real sure what the point of the above is. "Merit legalism" is not a term I use. Nothing wrong with redundency; it is just not necessary. As far as including you in my definition of legalism -- most definitely. At least from what you have said on this forum.
The notion that doctrinal agreement is necessary to continued fellowship (unity) is central to legalism. You are a legalist. Is this something you deny? If so, what is the difference between your views and the general views of a legalist?
JD
