myth [it's a terrible a
misrepresentation of Barth's theology, below, while Barth's primary
issue is with the 'orthodox' meaning of 'history' per se ;
e.g., (for you) to question the
'historical' situation (and meaning) of the NT/resurrection is
not denial nullifying the salvific implications of Rom
10]
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:21:11 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Barth questions the historicity of the resurrection, This is not orthodox
||
