interesting, Kevin, you are
not disagreeing with JD that 'this is how' your
imagination works, below--intentional 'slur', as below, does play a role in
your approach to people, eh?
e.g., how do you explain Bill's
perception of your comment/s as 'slur'? isn't it correct, as JD observes, that
'slur' is an aspect of your theology?
also, isn't (e.g.) BB saying
that Mormons perceive 'slur' at work in your presence in SLC--is this
true?
ftr, it seems that employing an
intentional 'slur', apparently corroborated below, could be
considered slander--apparently it's your intent to slander Bill by the 'slur',
no?
give it some thought; when
convenient, please explain the role of 'slur' in your
current thinking, writing, and preaching (in a post in this thread if
you don't mind or to me privately)--a clear rational rationale for it is
required
thanks, in advance, for your
careful consideration/s
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:34:29 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
This would only be a slur to a SODOMITEApplying?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:In a message dated 3/2/2005 8:01:20 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh, and what's the deal with the slur ("Adam &William It is from the HSV - Homo Standard Version")? What have I done to deserve this?
Bill
Bill, this is how Kevin's imagination works. He sits around the house all day, making up cute little diddies to say -- thinking, of course, that he has exalted himself , intellectually and proven some kind of point all at the same time. Ozarkian theology works in this fashion.
Jd
||
