DAVEH:  Pretty funny stuff coming from a guy who admits to not understanding the Trinity, Perry!

    So Perry.....let me ask you the same question I asked Kevin.  Do you agree with the author, that Jesus is not the literal Son of God?????

    ...........As a friend once said, "Thanks. Inquiring minds want to know."

Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Methinks your mormon brainwashing is getting in the way of your understanding.

From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept work
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:18:52 -0700

DAVEH:   Whew!   That is a lot of stuff, Perry.  After reading through it though, I find much I'd dispute, starting with.......

*G-3:  Jesus is clearly not the Son of God in a literal sense, i.e., He was not physically procreated by
God*

........As you might suspect Perry, I do believe Jesus is clearly and literally, the Son of God.

   I also find it curious that the author does not discuss the plural meaning of Elohim, nor does he address some key passages such as Mt 5:48 nor does he discuss to my satisfaction the oneness of God as it applies to man as found in Jn 17:21.  Likewise, he doesn't address the nature of the Godhead very well.  In short, there is a lot I find lacking in this rather lengthy summary.

Charles Perry Locke wrote:

The mormon jesus is NOT the Jesus of the Bible, the one we Christians worship. Check out this link for details:

http://www.equip.org/free/DT160.pdf

Perry

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.


Reply via email to