RE: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

Wed, 04 May 2005 02:05:14 -0700

Only for confused theologians. 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 2:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

 

In his course 'Biblical Exegesis', Rikk Watts starts off with an explanation of 'Waltzing Maltida'. Judy could perhaps demonstrate to you Linda that such is not as simple as you suggest.

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: May 03, 2005 22:16

Subject: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

 

The lessons it teaches are true.  One must first look for the possibility that each word/phrase means exactly what it says, barring obvious parables and illustrations. The simplest approach is the easiest way to find the truth.  If one wants to avoid/distort the truth one only needs to muck it up by making it complex out of all proportion. Izzy

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 7:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

 

is the bible's poetry literal..what makes it true?

 

On Mon, 2 May 2005 21:33:24 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

 the Bible..isn’t true ([if not] “literal”) ..we.. believe it is [literal]?  Does it take “research” to rationalize justification for not believing it is literally true? Izzy

Reply via email to