I’m not sure that’s something you should be doing at all.

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 3:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

 

Ahhh but those quilts are sooooo stunning. One could not but appreciate you for those alone, in spite of that which you have in common with...well, why exacerbate so early in the morn'?

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: May 04, 2005 05:03

Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

 

Only for confused theologians. 

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 2:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

 

In his course 'Biblical Exegesis', Rikk Watts starts off with an explanation of 'Waltzing Maltida'. Judy could perhaps demonstrate to you Linda that such is not as simple as you suggest.

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: May 03, 2005 22:16

Subject: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

 

The lessons it teaches are true.  One must first look for the possibility that each word/phrase means exactly what it says, barring obvious parables and illustrations. The simplest approach is the easiest way to find the truth.  If one wants to avoid/distort the truth one only needs to muck it up by making it complex out of all proportion. Izzy

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 7:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

 

is the bible's poetry literal..what makes it true?

 

On Mon, 2 May 2005 21:33:24 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

 the Bible..isn’t true ([if not] “literal”) ..we.. believe it is [literal]?  Does it take “research” to rationalize justification for not believing it is literally true? Izzy

Reply via email to