|
DaveH says:"Lance....I think you've done a
reasonable job of assessing my position." I'm going to restate that which I deem
central and, ask for as direct a response if you feel comfortable giving one
publicly. Should you wish to contact me privately, I'd honour that privacy. IFF
Joseph Smith was, in reality, a false prophet then, would your whole belief
structure collapse? Drawing from James 1, perhaps not solely but at least
centrally, does your subjective encounter override even the possibility of
Joseph Smith being a false prophet? If this is too convoluted (it even sounds so
to me) then, restate it in your own words and provide me with an answer.
thanks,
Lance
|
- [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: public/participating & priva... Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: public/participating &a... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: public/participating &a... Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: public/participatin... Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: public/particip... Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: public/part... knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: public... Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: public/participatin... Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: public/particip... knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: public/particip... Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: public/part... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: public... knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons: pu... knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] To the Mormons... Dave Hansen

