|
Terry Clifton wrote: I understand your answer, Dave, but I have problems with it. What brought about this comment by Jesus was the possibility of more than one wife here on earth. If your first wife dies, you are free to take another. We know that God's plan for man has always been one man for one woman for life.DAVEH: Upon what basis do you draw that conclusion, Terry? As you must know, many of the Lord's prophets had more than one wife. Do you think his servants, the prophets, did not understand God's plan? If that is His desire here, then it would be His desire in Heaven, if there were marriages in Heaven. That creates a problem for the man that has married two or more women who preceeded him in death. The problem being, who would be the one wife?DAVEH: Had they been sealed (bound) on earth by somebody who had the keys as did Peter (Mt 16:19), all would have been sealed (bound) in heaven. Because of this, Jesus has proclaimed that there will be no marriage in Heaven,DAVEH: Read vs 30 again......... For in the resurrection, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven. .......I would understand that to mean marriage will not take place in heaven. It does not say that marriage would not exist in heaven. I think you are reading something into Scripture that it does not say, Terry. except the marriage of the Church to the Lamb, the King, Jesus Himself. It solves the problem of multiple marriages and it solves the problem of what to do with a believer whose spouse has gone to Hell while the believer entered Heaven. No husband? No problem. We are married to the Lord.DAVEH: Seems to me that literally taking it the way you are, it would create another major problem. Do you want to be married to a male, Terry? Why do many Christians fight tooth and nail against same sex marriage in this life, only to believe they are going to be married to a same sex partner after this life? Seems pretty screwy to me, unless one views it from my perspective. I think you misunderstand what the Bible teaches concerning this. Your view simply presents too many obstacles to be workable.DAVEH: It works for me, Terry. If God had no problem with polygamous marriages in the OT, I don't argue that marriage is only for one man/woman. If the Lord tells us we can seal up things here on earth that will last past the barrier we call death, I feel no reason to doubt that can apply to marriage and hesitate to deny the power of God grant us that power. As a Mormon, I believe families can be forever. It is a main doctrine of our Church. When Protestants (and some TTers) tell me that sexual identity does not exist in heaven, and that loving family relationships end upon death, I've got to wonder why God brought us to earth, gave us the the challenge of having a loving and secure family only to rip it all apart before we enter heaven. Doesn't make sense to me. Thanks for your thoughts though.DAVEH: You are welcome, Terry. Terry -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. |
- Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsis... Terry Clifton

