Another post that is right on. I especially see the value in the ordered syntax = God in Man in Christ rules. Law does not establish the reign of God !! The law was but for a season - given to a small part of mankind. Anyway -- I apologize for the half sole. G's words stand alone. They just got me to thinking.
And thanks again, Mr Locke. Wasn't there some big named philosopher named Locke??
JD
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:31:44 -0600
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
myth ['It is because of [God] that you [Corinthians] are in Christ Jesus..'(1Cor1)]
(Commentary for the Moderator:
God's rule or reign is dynamic per se
God in Man in Christ rules
No laws established God's rule or reign--God's rule or reign is independent of philosophical and moral criteria
Laws preoccupy those who don't recognize God's reign
Those who recognize God's reign in Christ obey it )
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:48:23 -0400 Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com> writes:
[the] doctrine of the "incarnation" leads you into godliness and holiness..
