Let us suppose that David Miller and Judy Taylor have both understood and articulated an incorrect understanding of the Nature of God therefore, by extension, the Gospel. Let us suppose that Bill Taylor has apprehended and articulated this more accurately.Or, let us suppose the exact opposite is the case.
 
The SP discussion
 
The political discussion. Left/right, Iraq, the G8, forgiving third word debt and, the like.
 
The Mormon 'gospel' or any other 'gospel' perceived by some to be a 'pseudo gospel'.
 
The 'holiness' discussion which includes an understanding of sanctification, perfection, growing in grace, 'spots & wrinkles' and, the like.
 
Versions of the Bible to preferred over others.
 
So-called plain folks vs experts. Some say 'just read the Bible, trust the Spirit to show you the meaning then, do it'. Some say 'OK but, it's a little more complicated than that'
 
etc., etc., etc.
 
People 'Amen' those who believe and teach as they do. On a good day, they'll engage those who believe and teach differently. On a bad day they'll ratchet things up a notch by resorting to 'conduct unbecoming.'
 
So then, as to the subject: The Spirit of God will not change one mind/heart on TT as to any of the above.'Smiley's' aside nobody's gonna move from one position to another. Who you are and, what you believe now is who you will be and what you will believe when you die! 
 
The exception that proves the rule: John Smithson.

Reply via email to