It amazes me just how far off course you can get. There are no infallible understandings. You do not have an "infallible perspective." Rather, you have a perspective that is full of passion and conviction.
My explanation of " no one on TT believes in doctrines of me" was NOT explained as you suggest below. No where do I give this explanation. Rather, I spoke of personal perspective and I made that clear early on. Nothing from my point of view of a "doctrine of man." Ditto for Lance or BT or you. Do you not understand my point? Shall I say it differently to help you understand?
I need no protection from your imaginations, David. Protect yourself. And let us all pursue this thread. It is extremely important. Just stop with the silliness of "slanderous" and "blasphemous." I speak as moved by the Spirit in precisely the same way you claim -- accept it or give me a way of knowing when I am not doing so.
JD
-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:06:12 -0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14
Sorry, John, but that is not my position. On certain matters, yes, I have an infallible perspective. Jesus is the Messiah. I speak that with infallible assurance. The Holy Spirit is shed abroad unto all who believe in Jesus. This is infallible. The Scriptures and the Spirit are in agreement. Another infallible statement. I could go on and on. What is NOT infallible is your statement that not one person on TruthTalk believes in "doctrines of men." Now you explain that you were speaking falsely in order to try to expose me. That is very dangerous, to speak for the Spirit of the Lord, hoping others would find the foolishness of it. VERY DANGEROUS. You certainly have the same privilege to speak infallibly when such is warranted, but when you pretend to speak infallibly in the name of the Lord about that which is false, that is VERY DANGEROUS.
Perhaps we should stop this thread right now. I do not want to facilitate you blaspheming the Holy Ghost and having no chance of repentance.
David Miller.
----- Original Message -----From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 7:15 PMSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14Allow me to solve this problem. That last sentence is an echo of YOUR POSITION, David. I had hoped you would see the fault in that statement but you miss the point. You, DM, the one who believes that it is the work of the Spirit to give you the correct interpretation do not allow me the same privilege!JD
-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:33:03 -0400
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14
JD wrote:
>> Not one person on this site believes in >> "doctrines of men." >> I do not allow a difference of opinion on >> this issue. I have been led by the Spirit >> into this statement and cannot, therefore, >> be wrong. Lance wrote: > 'When you equate your statement of the truth > with the truth itself, you've already begun to move > from the truth.' Why are you not addressing JD's statement above? Is he not equating his statement of the truth with the truth itself? Peace be with you. David Miller.
