John wrote:
> For the record, David,  you haven't a clue as
> to what is ad hom  --  haven't had one since
> I have been a part of TT.   Here is a dictionary
> definition of that concept  (yes,  I know how
> to use one too):
> "an argument directed to the personality, prejudices,
> previous words and actions of an opponent rather
> than an appeal to pure reason."   Webster.
> Your ".......another one of your meaningless tautologies"
> most certainly fits the definition.

LOL.  We had better request the help of the moderator on this one John. 
Perry, please try and help John understand what an ad hominem argument is. 
He perhaps needs to understand this more than anybody else on the list.

The word "tautology" speaks to the rhetorical value of what you said.  It 
does not fit this Webster definition at all.  You take things way too 
personal.  You might be offended that I suggested your statement was 
logically true but meaningless, but that does not make it an ad hominem 
remark.  Again, it all comes down to addressing what you are saying rather 
than you.  If I said that you are a meaningless tautology or that you are 
dumb or that you are lying or that you are dishonest, any of this would be 
ad hominem arguments.  Pointing out the logical validity and rhetorical 
value of your statement is not.

John wrote:
> this is in addition to the fact that you use the word
> "tautologies" without regard to what the word means.
> If, in fact, you did not use a dictionary,  my I suggest
> that you do so.

The word "tautology" might be new for you, but I have been using it for half 
my life.  Why would I need to consult a dictionary?  I could write a better 
definition than any dictionary definition you could come up with.

If you need some help understanding my point in using the word tautology, 
let me suggest the following link:
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/t/ta/tautology.htm

Here's another one:
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/Debating-1.html#Tautologies

And another:
http://www.wcdebate.com/1parli/29truism.htm

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 

----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to