|
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Judy wrote: ... I am curious about you. Why do you have to have a Jesus born into the same sin, frailty, and weakness as us? I don't "have to have it" this way. I learned this from the
Scriptures.
I already gave you some passages. Here are a few others:
Hebrews 5:7-9
(7) Who in the days of his flesh, when he had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto him that was able to save him from death, and was heard in that he feared; (8) Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered; (9) And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him; Notice the phrase here, "in the days of his
flesh." This was a significant event. Compare this with the
passages I already shared in the last post.
jt: Maybe I don't read as much into it as you do
David. To me "in the days of his flesh" means before the cross and we know
when he offered up these prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears
- in the garden of Gethsemane. If I knew
that was before me it would be that and
more.
Consider the next one too:
Hebrews 2:9-18
(9) But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man. (10) For it became him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings. (11) For both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one: for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren, (12) Saying, I will declare thy name unto my brethren, in the midst of the church will I sing praise unto thee. (13) And again, I will put my trust in him. And again, Behold I and the children which God hath given me. (14) Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; (15) And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage. (16) For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham. (17) Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people. (18) For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted. Just read this Scripture, Judy. How can you miss it? Jesus was
made a little lower than the angels, why? To experience mortality!
To experience death. To be made like us in every way. To be made
perfect through sufferings, the same way we are perfected. Look at verse
11, "both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one."
This is the reason he calls us brethren.
jt: Remember David that this is written AFTER the cross
ie "he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified" - New Birth - Holy
Spirit - we are one in the same way that He and the Father were one during
His earthly ministry.
He was made just like us. Look at verse 14. He says, "as the
children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself
likewise took part of the same." jt: Yes he had a flesh and blood body with the same
limitations as the ones we have only he was not "just like us"
David.
The difference is one of heart/holiness and God gave
the Spirit without measure to Him (John 3:34) We have nothing
like that going on. His mind didn't have to be
renewed - at the age of 12yrs He knew more than the teachers at the temple and
there is no record that he was ever physically sick.
The reason given here is the same as in Romans 8:3 where he says that he
was made in the likeness of SINFUL flesh.
That he might have power over the bad aspects of the flesh, which include death and the law of sin and death that resides in the flesh. jt: David I still do not accept that "likeness" is same
as the real thing, or even that it was necessary that He have the same weakYes
He condemned sin in the flesh by fulfilling the Law in his own life following
which He lay down His physical life for us on a sinner's cross so that
ultimately He became an eternal sacrifice. If He came with the same flesh
weakness that we have inherited he wouldn't have kept the law either.
Think about it. Jesus living in Romans 7 along with Paul.
Then read verse 16. How much clearer can he be? He took on him
the SEED of Abraham. His FLESH was descended from the seed of
Abraham. There it is right there in Scripture. Inescapable.
jt: The seed of Abraham is not flesh it is
spiritual. Isaac is the seed of Promise and Christ is the fulfillment of
that promise.
Ishmael is the fleshly seed and they are still warring
against one another just like the Spirit and flesh do in us.
Muslims want to reject this view. Jews want to reject this
view. EVEN SOME CHRISTIANS want to reject this view. The idea
of Christ being come in the flesh seems anathema to those who hate the flesh and see God as far removed from it. jt: I don't hate the flesh David. I believe we are
fearfully and wonderfully made. However, we need to call things what God
calls them. I am no fan of Augustine or Calvin; they had some light along
with a lot of error but who wants to stay camped there?
What fellowship has light with darkness?
jt: Both spiritual concepts the body isn't darkness, it
makes no decisions - it does what we tell it to do.
How can God Almighty become flesh like us? Impossible? Sounds
like it, but no, it is a great mystery that one can understand if we press
through to grasp it.
jt: Oh no David. Here we go with the
mystery. This is a favorite ploy of those following the RCC Church Fathers
and their teachings. Every time they get in a mess they call it a
mystery.
Judy wrote:
Are you also holding to this incarnational Athanasian concept or is it your background in biology? No, Judy, I did not get this understanding from Athanasia. I got it
from reading the Bible. I will grant you that my biology background has
helped me tremendously to understand how the flesh is the source of selfish
behavior in ways that probably surpasses the apostle Paul.
jt: Not the body by itself David; flesh in the sense of
soul or mind, will, emotions.
At the same time, I am amazed that Paul understood these things as he did
without having the understanding of biology that has been unveiled within our
generation. Regardless of my biology background, these things are understandable
without any of that. The Bible teaches it. That is all we
need. I wonder why you are resistent to the idea. For someone who
clearly wants to stay clear of Roman Catholicism and Calvinism, you buy into it
hook, line, and sinker on this issue. Why?
jt: I am definitely not buying into anything Augustine
or Calvin were teaching about all this. I see spiritual death happening to
A&E in the garden but what I am talking about is not the same thing
Augustine promoted or Calvin after him... and about this idea of Jesus being our
brother. I see this as a post Resurrection truth - that is,
after we have received the Promise of the Father and we are one with Him
because of the Spirit. This is the whole idea of the New Creation in
Him. We reckon the old man dead - put off the old and put on the
new. All this talk about everyone's old man (the whole world) being
assumed and resurrected is worse than the immaculate conception and
just as heretical.
Perhaps it is your desire to make Jesus unique as a person?
Recognizing that he is flesh does not have to interfere with his
uniqueness. He was unique, just as Isaac was unique from Ishmael.
Jesus was God manifest in the flesh, not some alien flesh, not the flesh of
pre-fallen man, but human flesh descended from Abraham and David. This is what
the Bible teaches.
jt: To me this negates God's holiness which is what
separated Him from humanity. I know on occasion He spoke with
ppl
such as Job, Abraham, and the prophets but look at all
they had to go through to approach him when he was Father/Husband
to Israel, all the washings. It took them three days to
prepare. Think about Isaiah the first thing out of his mouth in God's
presence "I am a man of unclean lips" So are we David - because we have a
heart problem. Jesus didn't, in fact all of His words were Spirit and
Life. He spoke no death at all. This can not be said of us.
Not any of us. So I'm sorry I just can not
see Him the same way that you do; because to me there
are some huge issues.
If we were to do genetic testing on his flesh, we would find him related to
Mary his mother, and also related to all the ancestors that Matthew so carefully
outlines for us. Why would you find this difficult to accept?
Perhaps you should begin, one by one, to mention some of your objections.
If we can answer your every objection, then maybe you could consider afresh what
the Bible is teaching on this subject.
|
- [TruthTalk] Humanity of Jesus Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Humanity of Jesus David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Humanity of Jesus Kevin Deegan
- Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Humanity of Jesus Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Humanity of Jesus knpraise
- [TruthTalk] Humanity of Jesus Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Humanity of Jesus Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Humanity of Jesus David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Humanity of Jesus Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Humanity of Jesus David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Humanity of Jesus Kevin Deegan

