Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter'

[Blainerb473]

In a message dated 7/24/2005 10:31:24 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >  It [the bom] sincerely is what it says it is. How do you know this?     I read it, I now read it, I will read it, I will have read it . . . too many internal consistencies for it not to be true.  I can open it to any page, and be impressed with its truthfulness.  It does not, contrary to claims, contradict the Bible.  Just a few of many reasons why I know it is true. Blainer