Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14

[knpraise]

You stand against the spirit of unity and function as if love of the brethren was a meaningless concept. 

 

Jd 

 
-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:50:52 -0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14

No need to put anyone "out" JD.  The Word of God is divisive and people who are not willing to do things

His way get offended and eventually separate themselves. That is, unless there is a compromising preacher

who wants to please ppl more than he wants to please God.    jt

 

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:11:14 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Legalists, when "holding office" in the Church of Right Teaching, do IN FACT require agreement on (their) pet issues or you are out.   Such happens every week of every year in the U.S.  

 

JD 

 

From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>

Since I've been accused of being one of the God manipulators - might I put my 2 cents in here please.

Let me say that I am not requiring anything of anyone. So far as I'm concerned you Gary and everyone else

can do whatever they want - but your blood will not be on my hands, nor on that of anyone else who has

tried to speak truth to you.  Those who reject truth judge themselves as unworthy and eventually God Himself

gives them over to strong delusion so that they might believe the lie.     jt

 

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:41:15 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

for humans biblical salvation is purely voluntary, like the Alamo--you wanna defend the KoG in history with JC, cross his line in the sand

 

this is obedience to him--salvation (via 'a crucifixion') you volunteer for is just that, voluntary

 

who, then, as a volunteer, has any right to compel the involuntary religious obedience of another?

 

while the G-m's (God-manipulators) among us do exactly that requiring y/our compliance by a certain force, ask 'compliance? to whom?'

 

i'd say these G-m types never volunteered for nothin' worth volunteerin' for and that's their real problem; FTR, neither God's nor mine

 

 

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:32:32 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 

To argue that salvation is free but after the initial event, we must obey to maintain this salvation is wrong on several levels:

||

6.    [re: pronouncing] 'that what God could not do for man, man must do for himself !!'

||