|
Do you have any QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS OTHER THAN
THAT ONE?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: October 02, 2005 07:00
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mythology and
the "list"
THE MARCH WACHOPE
PRESENTATION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOLY SNICKIES -- YOU HAVE THAT ON
CD ??? I was just
telling BillyT how disappointed I
was that same was not available. That lecture was perhaps
the most important lecture I have personally every heard. Is there
anyway of getting a copy?
Jd -----Original
Message----- From: Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[email protected]Sent: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 04:53:24
-0400 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mythology and the "list"
ALL are elect in Jesus!!!!!!!! This is
God's 'ONE TRUE PURPOSE'!
Other than the 'heart' of JD and the 'lyrical' contributions of 'G', TT is 'bout ready to dry up and blow away.
NOTE TO JD:
CBK is in town and, I'm listening to the
March Wauchope presentation whilst driving
to and from. I'm going to see him later today if you've got any
comments/questions you wish to pass along.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: October 02, 2005 00:31
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mythology and
the "list"
Again , you make comment that has little to do with what I have
written. At least you are consistent.
You really like the sound of the "narrow road" thingy, don'e
you? I prefer the part that says there are so many, they cannot
be counted.
JD -----Original
Message----- From: Judy Taylor < jandgtaylor1@juno.com> To: [email protected]Cc:
[email protected]Sent: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:45:05
-0400 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mythology and the "list"
So?
We may be at different places in our pilgrimage but
are basically travelling the same road which is the
narrow path with he strait gate. Whereas
others on TT appear to be breathing rarified air and on
the
broad road ... jt
I have a definition and fully understand what "judgmentalism" is. Nothing double
tongued about it. Give me your definition and I'll
share mine. The clear reason why you Wingers refuse to present a list of doctrines upon
which we must all agree has to do with the impossibility of the
matter -- your list, Deegan's list, Judy's list or DM's list would not be the same !!!
So you all pretend to agree with each other while refusing, at the same
time, to offer specifics as to this mythological list. You
judge others to hell but refuse to be accountable. &n
bsp; Ditto on this definition for
judgmentalism. You all cannot give a
definition that does not find yourselves at fault.
But I already knew this.
JD -----Original
Message----- From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[email protected]Sent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:56:19 -0500 Subject: RE: Re:
[TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community for homosecuality
How can you be so double-tongued, JD? You accuse me of that all the time!!! iz
I believe it is spelled "judgmentalism," Bub, and
why bring up the word anyway - no one on the right has a clue
as to its definition. Hard to accuse someone of it when you
don't know what it is.
JD -----Original
Message----- From: Kevin Deegan < openairmission@yahoo.com> To:
[email protected]Sent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community for homosexuality
And your Judgemental too!
Is your Brand of HATE speech and JUDGEMENTALISM allowed
in the People's Republique of CANUCKastan?
Lance Muir
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin: Y'all confuse HONESTY with HATEFULNESS. Y'all don't SPEAK, Kevin, y'all SPEW! JD has recognized
this 'bout y'all since I bin on TT.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: September 29, 2005
15:51
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay community for homosecuality
Stop being so HATEfull Lance. Lance
Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He did indeed 'hit sin on the head',
Judy. Mostly however, he hit it on the head with those in the 'churches' of His day.
That ring any bells with any of you out there? (Judy, Kevin, Iz) At whom/with whom do we see
His anger most expressed? At whom/with whom do we see the opposite?
Why look, it's the very ones y'all choose to hate, demonstrate
against etc. Hmm
mmmmmmmm strange hugh?
Do we all read the sa me Bible?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: September 29, 2005
07:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay community for homosecuality
Why arn't you talking about the "gay
issue?" We are supposed to minister the way Jesus did as He
is our example
and He always hit sin head on ie
He confronted the rich young ruler with his heart of covetousness
which he was not
yet willing to part with. Jesus didn't chase after him and keep talking
about grace. He did minister to those God showed
Him and warned them to go and sin no more lest a
worse thing come upon them.
But He didn't minister to everyone he met.
Today we take sin so lightly because
we don't believe God means what He says or that the chaos in our
lives is rooted
in sin and unrighteousness. God is supposed
to bless this mess because of grace, because he loves us so much
and this
is the lie. He will not do it
because to do so He would have to
violate His own Word. You can talk grace till the cows
come home but until this person hears the truth
and is willing to repent from the heart God will not honor
your words JD.
Well, maybe God
has put us together "for such a time as this."
Right now the relationship is something of a novelty
-- at least for him. My conversation
with him is different from "the others." So,
maybe I might be able to make sense to him.
What I am not doing is talking about the gay issue, per se. He is but I am trying
to get him to stop and examine what it means when it says
that "Christ died for us while we were YET
sinners." My concern is that he understand
the gospel of grace and , and, and, what it really mean
s to be "saved." The new birth will
produce& nbsp; - given time
............... so that is where I begin
-----------&n bsp; with the new
birth. JD ====================================
I wish you well. Terry
|
