Re: [TruthTalk] Restoration versus condemnation-David Miller

[Dave Hansen]

DAVEH:   There's the problem, Dean.   When I asked you the question, Are you hallucinating again, Dean?, you automatically assume that I am accusing you of hallucinating.   That's not the case at all.  It is a rhetorical question, not an accusation.  You are just saying things that I would think would typically come from one who is hallucinating.  That's not an indictment of you being a drug user.  It merely indicates your thinking process seems to emulate one, Dean. Judy Taylor wrote: cd: By the way -You are claiming I have hallucinations now. DaveH I am not the one seeing 6'2" men dressed as Quakers on the moon quacking at people as they journey back from vacation on their way home to the sun (rushing to get there before dark).By the way the7' quakers are on the dark side of the moon. How far will you go to defend your Lord J.Smith-what's next me going into convulsions?   This is too funny Dean - Is this really part of accepted Mormon doctrine? The rest of it is strange enough but Quakers/quackers on the moon?  I thought you all were being funny.  Surely this is not for real?  jt   > > >DAVEH:   Are you hallucinating again, Dean?  I never insulted you > by > > >calling you a drug user, or backstabber.  I certainly might have > asked > you > > >what you were smoking, as some of the claims you make are so > screwed up > > >that they sound as if they are from somebody who's mind has been > influenced > > >by drugs.  But...I'm pretty sure you aren't a doper, despite > sounding > like > > >one at times.   And again FTR.....I never claimed you are a > backstabber. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.