|
You are reading with the help of the powers of darkness
Lance. I do not denigrate people. This is an
unfounded and evil accusation.
No accusation here, Judy. This is a simple
statement of objective truth.You are forever denigrating persons both on and
off TT. You call it speaking the truth when so doing.
Oh, here is one I missed,
1. Yes most of the time I find your writings to be
unclear rather than plain Lance
2. No I don't imply anything, I figure those
who walk after the Spirit understand God's Word.
3. This accusation is uncalled for Lance because
what I addressed was personal accusations and this is what you
are
doing right here.
Obviously you didn't understand what I was addressing ... Oh well!
What's new....
JUDY:Am I being unclear? (I often am). Let me
take another run at it. On those occasions
in which you indicate that you've CORRECTLY APPREHENDED THE MEANING OF
GOD'S WORD(s) on given issue, do you not implicitly or explictly indicate
that the one(s) with whom you are speaking do not? Would you have genuine difficulty if recalling many such
instances over the last 6 months?
What then, am I attempting to say? YOU DO
THAT WHICH WEARIES AND DISCOURAGES YOU. Thus, on occasion(s) THAT WHICH
YOU DO WEARIES AND DISCOURAGES SOME ON TT IN EXACTLY THE SAME FASHION.
Do you understand?
Do you agree with this assessment?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: December 14, 2005 08:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TT Double
Standard
No Lance, I wouldn't acknowledge this to be the
case because everything that is spoken on TT is not the
Word of God, and not everything I write is
the Word of God because that would have to include opinion
at
times along with personal stories. So
what is the point you are trying to make here? Is it good to be
calling one
another hypocrites and disrespecting the
Moderator? Where do you think this kind
of attitude leads??
When you describe that which you say as
THE TRUTH OF THE WORD OF GOD Judy, while that spoken by another as
OTHER THAN the truth of the word of god, Judy then, you are doing the
very thing that you speak of as 'both discouraging and wearying'.
Would you not acknowledge this to be the case?
We should make accusing each other
personally a matter to be discussed offline.
I find these constant accusations
to be both discouraging and wearying - are we interested in Truth or
not? Why give the
enemy a platform to tear each other down.
DAVEH: I don't think you understand the nature of
my posts, Perry. I'm not talking about your sexual
experiences. I'm talking about Christian hypocrisy and the double standard as
practiced on TT. Is the double standard on TT not a
fair topic? Why should I have to discuss that matter
offline? Is this not relevant to all TTers,
Perry?
I find it very telling that
you make false accusations against me.......
you
suggest I might have some knowledge of Izzy's sexual
experiences,
.........which I did not do. Go back
and read my exact words if you don't believe me. If you
can't find them, I'll gladly provide them and you can see for
yourself that you are again accusing me of something I did not
do.
you suggest that saying "one of Joseph Smiths
spiritual wives" might have some sexual
connotation,
..........That has been suggested before
on TT by other TTers, and the moderator did nothing to discourage
such comments. Now you want to ban me from posting something
other TTers can post with no retribution. This is simply
another example of a double standard.
you try to spin
Dean up by suggesting he gets "excited" by sexual
references.
.........I merely stated the truth
about Deans sensitivity to such things. This was not an
ad-hom attack. Is the truth now a problem on
TT? People have said a lot more vile things about me with no
condemnation by the moderator. Why the double standard now,
Perry?
these amount to false
accusations,
DAVEH: How can that
possibly be a false accusation if it is true,
Perry? If anything, it is you who is making
false accusations about me in this matter.
Once again....a TT double standard.
the intentions of
spinning Dean up on a banned
topic
DAVEH: You are absolutely wrong
again, Perry. You simply fail to understand the nature of my
posts. My intentions are not to spin up Dean at all.
It is you who I am trying to enlighten as to the Christian
hypocrisy involving the double standard practiced on TT with
regard to Mormons. Until you as the moderator
recognize it, why should I discontinue pointing it out every time
it occurs? Is not the TT double standard an acceptable
discussion topic?
Charles Perry
Locke wrote:
Dave, you suggest I might have some knowledge of
Izzy's sexual experiences, then you suggest that saying
"one of Joseph Smiths spiritual wives" might have some sexual
connotation, then you try to spin Dean up by
suggesting he gets "excited" by sexual references.
These amount to false accusations, with the
intentions of spinning Dean up on a banned topic. Any
more posts from you containing sexual references and I will have
to take you off the forum until you agree not to do so. Take any
issues you have up with me, offline, at this address, not on the
forum.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator comment **
Date:
Tue, 13 Dec 2005 07:29:32 -0800
* Please try to
/refrain /from making sexual references, especially /false
accuastions/.*
DAVEH: Let's see if I
understand this, Perry. Recently I asked some questions
that were no more sexually oriented than what you commonly
make, Dean then claimed foul......and you banned further
discussion based on the /perception /you and Dean had about
what those comments might have implied.
Now you have made a comment that can be perceived to be
sexually charged..........
*If lucky, you may become
one of his many spirit wives! *
..........and you
don't want to recognize the double standard? It is
interesting that when you or other TTers make any kind of
denigrating remarks toward LDS theology with sexual
implications, nothing is considered off limits. When I
point out this obvious double standard, I am cautioned by the
moderator to /refrain /from bringing the discussion to the TT
table under the guise of making/ false accusations/. It
must be convenient to have a moderator who can see non-LDS
posters through one non-judgmental eye, and perceive a
completely different perspective of LDS posters through the
other, more critical eye. I suppose if one has an ax to
grind against LDS theology, and is not embarrassed to publicly
admit such....then it should not surprise anybody to find that
person practicing a double standard. The curious part
about this is that it happens on a forum called /TruthTalk/,
where /truth /is presupposed to be the dominating factor, yet
it seems to be suppressed when it comes to recognizing the
Christian hypocrisy found here.
Charles Perry Locke
wrote:
Dave,
* Please try to
/refrain /from making sexual references, especially /false
accuastions/.* This is not the forum for that? I am sure
there are many discussion forums about sex if that type of
discussion interests you.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Perry's Sexually Suggestive
Comments
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:07:35 -0800
**If lucky, you may become one of his many spirit
wives! **
DAVEH: I wonder if Dean is
going to rebuke you for making such sexually suggestive
comments, Perry! If not, will we then have
another example of hypocritical Christianity in TT?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Just be sure you remember
your secret password and secret handshake so Joseph
Smith will allow you entrance into heaven. *If lucky,
you may become one of his many spirit wives! *
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Signing off...
Date:
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:19:35 EST
I guess
I never got to know you, Christine--but hope to meet
you in the
great beyond--you may be required to
testify at the Bar of God as to what you
have seen
and heard on TT--
Blainerb
In a message
dated 12/11/2005 11:24:52 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I am signing off. I have gotten
sucked into the world of TT, and I think it
would be beneficial to my GPA to bid adeiu.
Thanks for all the discussions. I
have
learned a great deal. May the Lord bless you and keep
you all.
It would be cool to meet you
all in real life some day. But maybe not all in
the same room. I wonder how that would turn
out... :-)
-Christine Miller
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
|
