Blainerb:  Hmm, well, at least you are able to spell out why the RCC Jesus is the same as the Evangelical Jesus.  Also, as I said in another post, if Dean knew the Biblical Jesus as well as he purports to, he would recognize him in the BoM and the D&C.    He is the same as you have indicated below for the RCC    :>) 
 
 
 
In a message dated 12/20/2005 8:14:16 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My Jesus, Dean, IS NOT DEFINED by the traditons of men.   Was Jesus born of a virgin.  Was He , at the same time, the Son of God?  Is He the Creator of the worlds.   Was he reased from the dead ?   Is it His sacrifice that presents us with the forgiveness of sins?  Yes to all this  --  and the RCC is fully agreed on these ppoints.  The RCC differs from my theology on two general levels  -  the importances of works and the place in worship for the traditions of the Church.  A third  consideration is the role of the Church as the revelator of God in Christ. But our God is the same.  
 
jd
 

Reply via email to