Re: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God

[Lance Muir]

IMO Dean, it is so much easier to speak with either a cultist or a non-believer than with Judy I never pass up an opportunity with either of these. I also speak, almost daily in our bookstore, with those espousing a variety of views on a number issues. I never sidestep any of them. I've never seen Judy budge a cm on any issue. I gave this 'blowing smoke' explanation to Perry with respect to engaging DM for the very same reason. You may come to whatever conclusion you wish as I simply don't have the energy to engage people who appear intractable. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dean Moore To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: January 06, 2006 14:52 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God       ----- Original Message ----- From: Lance Muir To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: 1/6/2006 1:43:19 PM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God Judy asks 'what is wrong with the scriptural understanding of Jesus', Lance? Lance answers 'Nothing whatsoever, Judy!' AND, Judy, when IMO the two (yours/His) are identical, I've no problem whatsoever in offering a resounding, AMEN! HOWEVER..........   You're not into self flaggelation, are you? Why not just let it go? As Perry said of me recently, 'you're just blowing smoke'. IMO, I'm not but, I'm not disturbed to have people think I am.  cd: Are you Lance not worried that you will lose creditability as a scholar of the bible and fail to convince others to listen to truth that comes from you-if those others think you are only blowing smoke-God may have given you the words to save a soul in Christ-shame to have that lost in the smoke?