cd: I am surprised and disappointed that you would be any part of this sin
David.

> [Original Message]
> From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 2/15/2006 6:45:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller
>
> Blaine, considering that I am an identical twin myself, I do understand
how 
> what you just said would be a reality check for astrology.  :-)
>
> David Miller
> Born March 3, 1960
> 4:50 am
> Cleveland, Ohio.
> In a snow blizzard that dumped 24 inches of snow.
>
>
> > David Miller
> >
> > p.s. Blaine... my astrological sign is pices. I guess that astrology
isn't
> > helping you be too predictive after all. :-)
>
> Thank you David, I have wondered about that.  Pisces is my opposite sign, 
> and, being the sign of transition from Winter to Spring, is next to
Aries, 
> the sign that ushers in Springtime (1st degree Aries is also the first
day 
> of Spring).    I believe all things are written in the stars--the trick
is 
> in reading them accurately. :>)    I try, and sometimes get pretty close
to 
> people by doing so.  But humans are so complex!!  Astrology helps, but is 
> not, of course, infallible.  But thanks for being open--lots of people
will 
> not divulge their birth info to me, probably think by doing so I might
form 
> unjustified opinions of them.  :>)
>
> One thing, though, without precise birth info--date, time of day, and
place 
> of birth--you can't tell too much beyond generalities. The beauty of
precise 
> astrological analysis is that no two personalities can ever be the
same--not 
> even identical twins--which is a reality check for astrology few people 
> understand.
> Blainer
>
>
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] il.innglory.org
> > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:07 PM
> > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller
> >
> > In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:02:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > I've not forgotten you, David. IMO, you are both incorrect and
immoveable 
> > on
> > at least a portion of that which is under discussion. What I've got to
> > determine is whether or not it is worth the 'ink' to engage further
with 
> > you
> > given what I've just said. I'm checking around with some who've read you
> > over time.
> >
> > Lance.
> >
> > Yes, David is pretty fixed--he was probably born under one of the four 
> > fixed
> > signs--Leo, Taurus, Scorpio, or Aquarius. Or, he's one of those highly
> > independent Aries characters, who never admit to being wrong!! If I knew
> > for sure, I could read him better.
> > Blainerb
> > 
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to