Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 02:50:38 -0800

DAVID:We await your response to the specific post re:DM/SIN Was it not you who made the christology/sin  along with the ideaological/pragmatic distinction?
 
DAVID:It may be that not unlike the cast in 'Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room'  that though your Greek grammar,  logic,  vocabulary aand your grooming (?) are impeccable, IFF you, along with the rest of humanity, ACTUALLY DO SIN IN THOUGHT/WORD/DEED DAILY then, you are simply wrong for the 'right' reasons. Don't be affeared David, y'all wouldn't be the first to have so thoroughly 'missed the mark'.(theologically) Thank the Lord David, provision has been made for such as you.
 
We promise not to make up signs reading 'BEWARE! DAVID MILLER, A (redeemed) SINNER (past, present and, future) ONE WHO STANDS ON EQUALSINFUL FOOTING WITH QUEERS RESIDES AT THIS HOME'
Sent: February 18, 2006 20:32
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative

 
You are still sticking with your bias of how you have been taught to read
the present tense.  Don't you notice how you keep retranslating the words
into an ing form that accepted translators do not use in their translations
(KJV, NASB, etc.)?   I don't care about the translations.  It (ing) is a way of bring out the linear action of the verb and it is the accepted manner of doing so in all the grammars I have seen.   What do you think I was presenting to you when I gave sources complete with page reference?   They all use the "ing"   and for the same reason I use that ending.  Are you suggesting that Robertson's comments (as you understand them)   trumps all of these grammictal illustration?   That the first year boys simply did not get it right  --  all of them?   But more than that  -- you do not think that "walk in the light" is an ONGOING activity?  Or that as long as I deny sin ()whatever that means) I will CONTINUE to be considered a liar.  You don't see that?   And, are you saying that present indicative actives never mean to imply linear action? 
 
jd

 


 

Reply via email to