> [Original Message]
> From: Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 2/20/2006 6:53:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative
>
> David:Kindly assist me as to any distinction that might exist between: 1.
> Those who are born of God do not sin. & 2. those who ...continue in their
> ADDICTION to sin.
>
> David:Kindly expand upon 'the commandments of Jesus'
>
> Just in the last week or two I've come to see what you, Dean, Judy and Iz
> are laying claim to with greater clarity. I'm looking again at those
> Scriptures quoted in support of this claim. I'm speaking with many folks
re:
> their 'experience'-----------------------
cd: Praise the God of Isreal for love towards his children in that he gives
light to those he chooses and withhold it from the prideful-yea, even babs
are allowed to see whereas the wise- in their own eyes- he has blinded even
to parables. May His name be blessed forever.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: February 19, 2006 17:30
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative
>
>
> > Lance, I am among those who keep the commandments of Jesus and walk in
> > love.
> > I have stated such many times. I believe the Lord is able to keep me
from
> > sin and transgressions for the rest of my life. Those who are born of
God
> > do not sin. This is reality. Deception comes from those who say they
are
> > in
> > Christ and yet continue in their addiction to sin. Christ is light and
in
> > him is no darkness at all.
> >
> > As for my being on the same footing as the lost of the world in my need
> > for
> > redemption, you are right. I preach such almost every time I preach to
> > sinners. I preach that I cannot point my finger of judgment because I
am
> > in
> > need of mercy just like they are in need of mercy. I am not the Judge,
> > but
> > rather I only bear testimony of the Judge because I know him and he has
> > sent
> > me.
> >
> > David Miller
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Lance Muir
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 5:50 AM
> > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative
> >
> > DAVID:We await your response to the specific post re:DM/SIN Was it not
you
> > who made the christology/sin along with the ideaological/pragmatic
> > distinction?
> >
> > DAVID:It may be that not unlike the cast in 'Enron: The Smartest Guys
in
> > the
> > Room' that though your Greek grammar, logic, vocabulary aand your
> > grooming (?) are impeccable, IFF you, along with the rest of humanity,
> > ACTUALLY DO SIN IN THOUGHT/WORD/DEED DAILY then, you are simply wrong
for
> > the 'right' reasons. Don't be affeared David, y'all wouldn't be the
first
> > to
> > have so thoroughly 'missed the mark'.(theologically) Thank the Lord
David,
> > provision has been made for such as you.
> >
> > We promise not to make up signs reading 'BEWARE! DAVID MILLER, A
> > (redeemed)
> > SINNER (past, present and, future) ONE WHO STANDS ON EQUALSINFUL FOOTING
> > WITH QUEERS RESIDES AT THIS HOME'
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [email protected] ; [email protected]
> > Sent: February 18, 2006 20:32
> > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative
> >
> >
> >
> > You are still sticking with your bias of how you have been taught to
read
> > the present tense. Don't you notice how you keep retranslating the
words
> > into an ing form that accepted translators do not use in their
> > translations
> > (KJV, NASB, etc.)? I don't care about the translations. It (ing) is
a
> > way
> > of bring out the linear action of the verb and it is the accepted
manner
> > of
> > doing so in all the grammars I have seen. What do you think I was
> > presenting to you when I gave sources complete with page reference?
They
> > all use the "ing" and for the same reason I use that ending. Are you
> > suggesting that Robertson's comments (as you understand them) trumps
all
> > of these grammictal illustration? That the first year boys simply did
> > not
> > get it right -- all of them? But more than that -- you do not think
> > that "walk in the light" is an ONGOING activity? Or that as long as I
> > deny
> > sin ()whatever that means) I will CONTINUE to be considered a liar. You
> > don't see that? And, are you saying that present indicative actives
> > never
> > mean to imply linear action?
> >
> > jd
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------
> > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
> > know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
> > http://www.InnGlory.org
> >
> > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have
a
> > friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
> >
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
