[Original Message]
From: Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Date: 2/20/2006 6:53:56 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative
David:Kindly assist me as to any distinction that might exist between: 1.
Those who are born of God do not sin. & 2. those who ...continue in their
ADDICTION to sin.
David:Kindly expand upon 'the commandments of Jesus'
Just in the last week or two I've come to see what you, Dean, Judy and Iz
are laying claim to with greater clarity. I'm looking again at those
Scriptures quoted in support of this claim. I'm speaking with many folks
re:
their 'experience'-----------------------
cd: Praise the God of Isreal for love towards his children in that he
gives
light to those he chooses and withhold it from the prideful-yea, even babs
are allowed to see whereas the wise- in their own eyes- he has blinded
even
to parables. May His name be blessed forever.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: February 19, 2006 17:30
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative
> Lance, I am among those who keep the commandments of Jesus and walk in
> love.
> I have stated such many times. I believe the Lord is able to keep me
from
> sin and transgressions for the rest of my life. Those who are born of
God
> do not sin. This is reality. Deception comes from those who say they
are
> in
> Christ and yet continue in their addiction to sin. Christ is light and
in
> him is no darkness at all.
>
> As for my being on the same footing as the lost of the world in my need
> for
> redemption, you are right. I preach such almost every time I preach to
> sinners. I preach that I cannot point my finger of judgment because I
am
> in
> need of mercy just like they are in need of mercy. I am not the Judge,
> but
> rather I only bear testimony of the Judge because I know him and he has
> sent
> me.
>
> David Miller
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lance Muir
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 5:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative
>
> DAVID:We await your response to the specific post re:DM/SIN Was it not
you
> who made the christology/sin along with the ideaological/pragmatic
> distinction?
>
> DAVID:It may be that not unlike the cast in 'Enron: The Smartest Guys
in
> the
> Room' that though your Greek grammar, logic, vocabulary aand your
> grooming (?) are impeccable, IFF you, along with the rest of humanity,
> ACTUALLY DO SIN IN THOUGHT/WORD/DEED DAILY then, you are simply wrong
for
> the 'right' reasons. Don't be affeared David, y'all wouldn't be the
first
> to
> have so thoroughly 'missed the mark'.(theologically) Thank the Lord
David,
> provision has been made for such as you.
>
> We promise not to make up signs reading 'BEWARE! DAVID MILLER, A
> (redeemed)
> SINNER (past, present and, future) ONE WHO STANDS ON EQUALSINFUL
> FOOTING
> WITH QUEERS RESIDES AT THIS HOME'
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [email protected] ; [email protected]
> Sent: February 18, 2006 20:32
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative
>
>
>
> You are still sticking with your bias of how you have been taught to
read
> the present tense. Don't you notice how you keep retranslating the
words
> into an ing form that accepted translators do not use in their
> translations
> (KJV, NASB, etc.)? I don't care about the translations. It (ing) is
a
> way
> of bring out the linear action of the verb and it is the accepted
manner
> of
> doing so in all the grammars I have seen. What do you think I was
> presenting to you when I gave sources complete with page reference?
They
> all use the "ing" and for the same reason I use that ending. Are you
> suggesting that Robertson's comments (as you understand them) trumps
all
> of these grammictal illustration? That the first year boys simply did
> not
> get it right -- all of them? But more than that -- you do not
> think
> that "walk in the light" is an ONGOING activity? Or that as long as I
> deny
> sin ()whatever that means) I will CONTINUE to be considered a liar.
> You
> don't see that? And, are you saying that present indicative actives
> never
> mean to imply linear action?
>
> jd
>
>
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
> know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have
a
> friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
