For me Lance, exactly means exactly and truth means
truth; no yours or mine about it.
Personalizing everything as you do leads to gross
deception.
May 'exactly' and your 'exactly' may not convey
the same meaning, Judy. This is, after all, what TT is about, is it not? My
'exactly' is, of course, God's 'exactly'. Once that is understood we can move
on.
Has Canada had a tsnuami? Is this a new Lance
or what?
Exactly!
Walking in as much light as one has been given
so far is not the same as what you have been promoting
Nor is it saying that ppl who have chosen
darkness are walking in light. It has to be one or the other
because there is no concord between Christ and
Belial.
Exactly!
I was in too much of a hurry; I meant to
say I do disagree Lance because as I see it some choose to
walk
in darkness; while others embrace the light
and as scripture says "the path of the righteous is like
the
light of dawn it shines brighter till the
full day". It is possible to be walking in all the light one
has and
ATST not be in error. Noone alive
today has the whole loaf.
You said 'No I don't disagree,
Lance'. Therefore some of that which you believe say is error.
Correct?
This is, IMO, being made
unnecessarily complex.
No Lance I don't because the
condemnation is that some prefer darkness to light and refuse to
come.
I believe some walk in complete
and total darkness and there is little or no fear of God in the
land, yours
or mine.
THERE IS OBJECTIVE TRUTH!! You,
Judy, see some of it. Everybody on the planet sees some of it.
Nobody, including you, has all of it. Do you
disagree?
You speak as though there were no
"objective Truth" Lance and to me it appears as though this
is where
you live. Not so for me and
others. We may be the minority but then just because
your opinion a majority or
ecumenical one; this
is hardly a recommendation -
is it??
I disagree. DH has chosen The
Mormon religion. To insult his religion is akin to the
"cartoon incident' re: the Muslims.
If John Lennon were to have
been my brother then, I'd most assuredly receive that as
an personal insult.
cd: Maybe to John Calvin but not towards
you-see the difference?If the truth insults then that
person needs to change not the truth. If I were to say
that John Lennon was a pig-that is acceptable as I am
not making a personal attack on you.But if I were to
insult you by calling you names then I have personally
attacked you and would be in error to do so Lance. If I
were to say to DavH : Mormons are stupid I have not
attacked DavH but rather my attack was on the teaching
of Mormonism. In short-express your self but don't let
it get personal.
IFO took your, and
Judy's, evaluation of John Calvin to be nothing short
of an insult. However, should you 'rule' on this
matter thus eliminating your/my assessment to be off
limits then, we would have no ongoing
dialogue.
By the way, wasn't there
some kind of mystery 'rule' about not responding to
posts with the above subject
heading?
No-there
isn't any "new rule". This is the same rule Perry
enforced. If I make the call that someone has broken
the Ad. Hom. rule- that protects others from verbal
assaults- then reply to that in private. If I did not
enforce this then the issue of that person wrongs
will become part of the debate and become unsolvable
as others got involved.-this is for you protection as
well as others. The non-enforcing of some past
Moderators has lead to many good minds leaving this
site.If these attacks continue Lance it will only be a
couple of people here and how long can two /three
people carry on the same
conversation?
----- Original Message
-----
Sent: February
26, 2006 07:10
Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] *********** To all list
members-Moderator Comment***************
----- Original
Message -----
Sent:
2/26/2006 4:13:42 AM
Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] *********** To all list
members-Moderator Comment***************
You spoke my question
"G"?????????
Moderator-This
simply means that the rules against insults and
personal attacks are going to be unforced by
me-others are under my protection and will get
fair treatment-I owe that to God not to those who
will not keep their agreement and abide by the
rules.
----- Original
Message -----
Sent:
February 25, 2006 18:07
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To all list
members-Moderator Comment***************
ftr, what does this
mean?
I plan on enforcing the rules of protection
on TT against those who love
ch[ao]s
|