|
It was 2) and, yes to both.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 15, 2006 07:23
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Dean as a
candidate for Moderator?
So
1) were you just angry
or
2) did you see the correct response to this "inflammatory brand" as
slams?
If it was 2 is that itself inflammatory?
Dean:It was a meaningless congratulatory
message. As I read yesterday's salvo, I see that you have indeed discovered
how to access the archives. Also, my slams at both you and Kevin went
over the line, often. You both exhibit a thoroughgoing apprehension of a
particular brand of Christianity. It is simply one that I find unnecessarily
inflammatory.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 14, 2006 14:58
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Dean as a
candidate for Moderator?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 3/14/2006 7:28:58 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Dean as a
candidate for Moderator?
What I've got against MLM's? (Multi level
marketing schemes) They choose persons who are not up to the task
and thus, are bound to fail. The list owner should have known this. IFO
did know this. DM is both more gifted and, more intelligent than I. Why
then, DM, did you ever make this choice? In so doing you hurt a fellow
believer unnecessarily. You owe such an one an
apology.
cd: Then why did you
tell me that you were glad I was made Moderator Lance-You even said
David made a good choice! Now you claim that you knew all alone I wasn't
cut out for the Job. Tell me in which statement did you lie? The first
one congratulating me or the one you make now? I suspect that truth
isn't very important to you
Lance.
__________________________________________________
Do You
Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
