On 06/08/11 23:17 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > A Dissabte, 6 d'agost de 2011 22:18:29, Cédric Krier va escriure: > > > Of course, that information could always be calculated out of the > > > COPYRIGHT but that would probably take too much effort for this need, > > > but it is an idea to keep that up to date. > > > > I don't see why duplicate information. > > Not that I want that in two files but that it is visible from within the > module > list in Tryton application. The thing is that end users who do not know how > to > use mercurial can know who did the module. This approach would allow > reviewers > and translators to be acknowledged too.
I want to simplify stuff not complexify it. We have already difficulty to maintain the copyright file (but this must be done for legal purpose). > Even some customers like their name appear in the module. We did several > modules with author "NaN for XXXX" where XXXX was the customer. This could be done in the README. > There could > also be some "Sponsors" field, though. People like to appear in the credits > and > I think we should find a way to give visibility to everyone that wants to be > acknowledged for the work she did or paid for. But I don't see any valid reason to put those information in the database. Should I remember that almost everybody aggree on removing the tryton website from menu client [1]. [1] http://bugs.tryton.org/roundup/issue1286 -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpuRhpMTOTuA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
