On 08/08/11 10:15 +0200, Bertrand Chenal wrote: > Le Sat, 6 Aug 2011 23:46:51 +0200, > Cédric Krier <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > On 06/08/11 23:17 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > > > A Dissabte, 6 d'agost de 2011 22:18:29, Cédric Krier va escriure: > > > > > Of course, that information could always be calculated out of > > > > > the COPYRIGHT but that would probably take too much effort for > > > > > this need, but it is an idea to keep that up to date. > > > > > > > > I don't see why duplicate information. > > > > > > Not that I want that in two files but that it is visible from > > > within the module list in Tryton application. The thing is that end > > > users who do not know how to use mercurial can know who did the > > > module. This approach would allow reviewers and translators to be > > > acknowledged too. > > > > I want to simplify stuff not complexify it. We have already > > difficulty to maintain the copyright file (but this must be done for > > legal purpose). > > What about simply displaying the copyright file in the module form ? > this means there is only one file to maintain and at the same time > provide visibility for the authors.
COPYRIGHT file doesn't have a defined place for installation. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpr7bSxzG0J7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
