On 08/05/12 00:09 +0200, Nicolas Évrard wrote:* Bertrand Chenal [2012-05-07 22:16 +0200]: I think that translation should be considered just like development. And thus only bugfixes for the translation should enter the main branch during the freeze.No. Translation is not like development. I don't want to have commit everyday for translations just because a new string appears because this means not just 1 commit more but now 10 commits (and more in the future).
The number of commit is irrelevant to the discussion. The sooner the translator do their job, the sooner the .po file will be ready, testable and thus the sooner the people will get the opportunity to correct and fix the translations.
Nobody translates a book when the writer is writing it!
In the peculiar process we're using, it would not happen this way since there is the codereview process which ensure that a full bunch of strings get in the main tree all together at once. -- Nicolas Évrard B2CK SPRL rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 E-mail/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
