2013/10/3 Cédric Krier <[email protected]> > On 03/10/13 15:20 +0200, Guillem Barba Domingo wrote: > > 2013/10/3 Cédric Krier <[email protected]> > > > > > Indeed all those arguments could be refuted by this simple question: > > > > > > If those "personal" packages are so good why are not there as official > > > packages in the distribution? > > > > > > > Because "be official package" requires more time and effort > > So this means "personal" packages are in poor quality because the author > has spend not enough time and effort on it.
Or not. Some of this extra time and effort is to acomplish with the burocracy of the "official workflow" what not always adds value. But it's not the discussion. > So I would not want promote > poor quality package when with Tryton we try to promote high quality. > I think it should be decided by the community. -- Guillem Barba http://www.guillem.alcarrer.net
