On 26.05.2017 16:59, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote: > El 26/05/17 a les 15:10, Raimon Esteve ha escrit: >> Hie Cédric >> >> 2017-05-26 14:57 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: >>> On 2017-05-26 14:09, Raimon Esteve wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> 2017-05-25 21:42 GMT+02:00 appu rongala <appu.rong...@gmail.com>: >>>>> Hi Devs, >>>>> >>>>> I have installed tryton4.2 and i feel it is slower than previous >>>>> versions. >>>>> I have tryton3.4 installed and that is faster than 4.2. >>>>> Am i doing anything wrong? >>>> Yes, since 4.0 is more slower than 3.8, 3.6... when have big data or >>>> complex forms. We tested with bin/trytond and WSGI app. >>> Without any standard measurements, we can not say anything. >>> If you have such data, please share it. And also the tools to make the >>> measures. >>> We also need to know what is measured? Tryton is a complex software with >>> many usages. It does not make sense to just say "it is slow". >> start a client action -> trytond -> finally the response client. >> > > On which client actions? How you are running both servers? Which > database server? How long takes to process a request on each version? > How many requests have you executed? Is the first request or the other > ones? > > There are too much factors that can influence, so if you do not provide > meaningful examples, it's useless. > You can try to run the client over mitmproxy like this: mitmproxy -R http://localhost:8000 -p 8088 and connect the client to it. It gives you some timing informations like:
First request byte 2017-05-26 12:07:21.961 Request complete 2017-05-26 12:07:21.985 First response byte 2017-05-26 12:07:22.027 Response complete 2017-05-26 12:07:22.043 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton-dev" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton-dev/1c85dc09-f4fd-a224-56c0-2cb7a2942abd%40t-online.de.
