On 25/06/11 14:45 -0500, Michael Hipp wrote: > On 6/25/2011 2:07 PM, Cédric Krier wrote: > >As I already said, the definition of derivative work can not be defined with > >a > >technical point of view. > > So by what point of view can it be defined?
For me, it must be seen from the point of view of functionalities. > >>(Obviously any > >>changes to the Tryton code itself would have to be published.) > > > >It is not mandatory to publish any of your code even if it is in Tryton > >it-self. > > I don't understand. If I make changes to Tryton and distribute > binaries of that changed code, the GPL requires that I publish the > Tryton code with my changes. Does it not? Yes but here you talk about distributing your modifications. If you give your modified Tryton version to someone-else, you must give him the source code and your changes must be under a compatible GPL license. But if you don't give the modified Tryton version, you have any obligation to distribute or publish it. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpupINf1xWqR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
