On 29/06/11 13:06 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 12:36:49, Jordi Esteve va escriure: > > As I said before, we have a similar opinion, one puts more emphasis in > > companies and the other in individuals that represents these > > companies. We think is better that some people make the decisions of > > the foundation (members) and others, companies or people, fund the > > foundation (sponsors) to avoid mix the decisions with money. > > IMHO both things are not incompatible. I think probably most of us will agree > that sponsors and members should be separated. So a company may be member but > not sponsor and another one may be sponsor but not member. The thing is that > if companies were allowed to be members, should they have the same vote than > individuals? I think it should be this way.
For me, you can be member and sponsor. I don't see any issue in this. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpXanAvIPjxI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
