A Dilluns, 19 de setembre de 2011 16:16:41, Albert Cervera i Areny va escriure: > A Dilluns, 19 de setembre de 2011 14:29:33, Nicolas Évrard va escriure: > > * Albert Cervera i Areny [2011-09-19 13:36 +0200]: > > >> I would like to add attention about the topic #12 [1]. > > >> Don't use the reply-to-all button when answering to the mailing list, > > >> this is really annoying to receive duplicate emails (and also not > > >> sorted). > > > > > >In some mailing lists (pgsql-hackers comes to mind) you're expected to > > >replying to everyone. I think the reasoning behind this is that people > > >get the response even if they're not subscribed. So, even if I > > >understand you find it annoying (I do not like it either but receive > > >those duplicated e-mails in those mailing lists) it is quite hard to > > >remember to press the appropriate button depending on the mailing list > > >you're in. > > > > Doesn't kmail have a reply to mailing list button ? > > > > I know mutt does so it allows three behaviors: > > - reply : will reply to the author (using the Reply-To: header) > > - reply-all: will reply to everybody (mailing list included) > > - list-reply: will reply to the mailing list using the > > > > Mail-Followup-To: header > > Don't know of it, but will try.
It uses the mailing list only (list-reply) but as I said in some mailing lists is not what they want. I will try to get used to it, but in the end, its a matter of habits and even in the discussion I used the answer everybody option. BTW, I think another reason for using reply-all in those mailing lists is that there's quite a lot of traffic and some hackers cannot follow all threads. With reply-all, people know they didn't miss that one. -- Albert Cervera i Areny http://www.NaN-tic.com Tel: +34 93 553 18 03 http://twitter.com/albertnan http://www.nan-tic.com/blog -- [email protected] mailing list
