On 19/09/11 16:55 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> A Dilluns, 19 de setembre de 2011 16:44:24, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> > On 19/09/11 16:24 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > > BTW, I think another reason for using reply-all in those mailing lists is
> > > that  there's quite a lot of traffic and some hackers cannot follow all
> > > threads. With reply-all, people know they didn't miss that one.
> > 
> > If I don't want to receive emails, it is my choice. You should not impose
> > to me to read your emails.
> > And if I want to receive a copy of your anwser, I will add my email in the
> > Mail-Followup-To, it should not be you to decide.
> 
> I'm just trying to explain what is the situation in other mailing lists and 
> why people may be used to it.

Apparently KMail still doesn't support the "Mail-Followup-To" :-)

Perhaps there are some others that's wrongly use the mailing list.
But I just ask to follow the netiquette (as it is on many others mailing lists).

-- 
Cédric Krier

B2CK SPRL
Rue de Rotterdam, 4
4000 Liège
Belgium
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Email/Jabber: [email protected]
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/

Attachment: pgpbSbRJLbEWB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to