> Especially, I fight because it is too easy to change. It is more difficult
> to
> have a clear vision for the long term and it is what I want to have for
> Tryton.
>
What you say is true, but that is just the reason why I want to collect and
make clear the ideas about this vision, so everybody can understand them.
I think you are underestimate the impact of adding a new color to the visual
> image of Tryton.
>
If it creates risks, we have to describe them and try to find a solution for
them.
Perhaps I'm not clear enought about my concern on a new color.
> I'm not against having other colors in the Tryton website, we already got
> somes. For example the news box for RSS feeds but it is different of the
> one
> of "Tryton Store". This is right because they have different
> semantic/purpose.
> But the current proposal adds a new color all over the website (if I
> understand it well), so such design makes this color full part of the
> visual
> image of Tryton.
>
If a change creates problems, mention these problems so we can understand
them and take care for a solution, or a better policy in the future.
I also do like standardization and a long term vision but that does not mean
that you can change things step by step and carefully watch pitfalls.
But as a community we have to mention these risks and write them down so we
can step by step take action, with these risks in our minds.
That is why I collect the ideas and requirements in a document, so I can
reread them in a summarized form ( to read the whole thread again, that is
what I find boring ... ;-)
Anthony
--
[email protected] mailing list
