On 19/11/11 22:57 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > Another point related to 'protection': PSF owns the trademark 'Python' and > logos, and holds Python's intellectual property rights. I don't know wether > it's a choice or if it's necessary in order to defend Python's licences (can > a fundation go by a judge to defend a software's license being respected if > it doesn't own the copyright on this software?). Maybe it would not be > possible with Tryton because of the GPL?
To create a fundation, we need to put something in it. We (B2CK) propose to put in the fundation the Trademark and the domain name that we own. About the defence of the licenses of course you need to be a copyright hoders to enforce it. But this doesn't prevent the fundation to help to protect it for example by advise, give money to copyright owners. > PSF says that 'no single private donor can supply a substantial percentage of > the PSF's total funding'. Maybe it's wise to think to such a limit? I don't see the usefulness of such limitation. Especially if the donators don't become member by just donating. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgp42FHcaTVyw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
