Le Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:32:00 +0100, Cédric Krier <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On 20/11/11 11:53 +0100, Bertrand Chenal wrote: > > Le Sun, 20 Nov 2011 10:18:05 +0100, > > Cédric Krier <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > On 20/11/11 09:08 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > > > > > I would go one step further, we should have the right > > > > > evaluate the donors and even deny a donation depending upont > > > > > the entity that makes the donation, no matter how big it is. > > > > > It's all about ethics. > > > > > > > > I also agree on that. > > > > > > I don't see why. As it is clear that there will be no duty for the > > > fundation because of donation, I don't see based on which > > > criteria we should accept or not a donation. > > > > What about a donation from company that does stuff like this > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disaster or this > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_S.A.#Controversies? Would you > > agree to accept fundation from them ? And put them on a donator > > page on the Tryton website? > > Come on guys! Are you all kidding? Even the FSF (the most political > FOSS fundation I know) doesn't have such rules [1]. And more over how > will you define such rules? Being controversies? Having a trial? > Also I don't know how it could be manageable, people will need to > apply before donating? > Please don't make of this fundation a political beast that will be > just blocked because of bureaucracy. > > > [1] https://my.fsf.org/donate > I agree that my example is extreme, but we have already talk about other ones, like a administrator stealing money from the foundation (and I think it's impossible to think about all the nasty stuff that can happend). Is there any mechanisms to convoke the members if there is an urgent topic to debate? -- Bertrand Chenal B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- [email protected] mailing list
