On 20/11/11 15:39 +0100, Udo Spallek wrote: > Cédric, > > Am Sun, 20 Nov 2011 02:51:41 +0100 > schrieb Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: > > On 19/11/11 22:04 -0300, Luis Falcon wrote: > > > >> I think that the Tryton foundation has to be independent from > > > >> B2CK and the other service providers, and so it should the > > > >> Tryton website. > > > > I find that promoting individuals or organisation that provides > > > > services arround Tryton, will match the goals of the fundation > > > > which will be promote, protect and develop. > > > That's exactly what I say. But that is __not__ placing ads that say > > > "pay for this functionality" in the official Tryton homepage. > > One thing is clear, if we don't have this kind of functionnality, in 5 > > years we will still have no production module. We have already wait > > for 3 years and there was no progress. > Thats simply not true. At least vegfullsquirrel and XoDofNoD discussed > and created the blueprint[1], which was a longer journey. Virtual thinks > already participated in financing the BOM part of the module[2]. > All done before Elveos...
Yes, I agree sorry. I was too fast with the "no progress". But you can agree that it was slow and such crowd funding speed up a lot the process. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpMfQhoeH7FY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
