Comment by [email protected]:
Ok. But naming schema doesn't reflect well the structure.
You mean ´account.dunning.level´ should be renamed to ´account.dunning.procedure.level´, or what do you propose?
I think it should be possible to have different report per level using a link but it doesn't force to have different reports. We could have a default one which is using a text from the level.
O.K., that's the most flexible solution.
Any way, I don't see any advantage to have it hard-linked to accounting. But there are advantages to not have it.
I.e. there should be two different objects, one that maps the move line to the dunning procedure to be applied (and is automatically created during the move line creation according to the partner default value) and one that has all the level advancements?
For more information: http://code.google.com/p/tryton/wiki/DunningModule -- -- [email protected] mailing list
