On 22/10/13 10:27 -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > None. > > I propose that you test Tryton to understand how it works. > > > > > > PS: Could you follow the netiquette and not write lines longer than 72 > > to 78 characters. It is really painful to read such email. > > > Céd: > > There are a lot of people who are attempting to contribute to the > development of Tryton, some with the developer's perspective, some with the > commercial perspective, and some manage to merge on both. By drawing on > netiquette to limit a highly important and decisive discussion about the > issues surrounding Tryton's abilities and competitiveness, instead of > showing the tolerance to be open minded and respect the hours of work that > others are putting into these issues, you show a very bad trait of > character that I feel is absolutely inappropriate.
Sorry but you are inverting the roles here. People not respecting the netiquette are those who are showing a lack of tolerance and doesn't respect the hours of work others. > Instead of limiting these issues in the way you do here and have done in > other cases, I really would welcome a much more open-minded approach, also > with regard to people from the commercial side. Sorry again but I don't see any limiting behavior from me in this thread. But I would expect from people starting discussion to do their homework first. Here clearly there is a lack of knowledge on how Tryton works on basis bricks as the supply management. > It is of no use to anybody here to limit discussions on issues where you - > with all due respect and recognition - do not possess the know-how and > in-depth knowledge to design things they may be needed. You should bring > people together on this, instead of leaving an impression to decide that > it's all dependent on your wisdom. I don't know how to take this. But I really think the lack of knowledge is not on my side, especially when we talk about the design of the application. And just to resume, the thread is about something already done (that happens 6 months ago) that someone doesn't understand and which is indeed very small and with a limited impact of the system because it is just a warning. So we are not talking about something new or something that should be changed. And by the way, it is not "all dependent on my wisdom" but you have to bring good solid arguments if you don't want to be dismissed. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpY6RFGjupdc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
