On 05 Jul 11:55, Cédric Krier wrote: > On 05 Jul 09:23, Dr. Axel Braun wrote: > > Bottom-line: current solution increases complexity without adding real > > benefit. Ideally this would be configurable (e.g. different material > > type for configurable materials) and have just 'material' for the > > standard, instead of template/variant. > > So please before spreading FUD on the solution which is configurable and > working well, test it.
Indeed the current design is a quite well balanced between the simple
needs and the more complex needs.
And about the cost/prices etc., it is a matter of «configuration» to
move down the fields to the variant level. The code is design to support
that as you can see here:
http://hg.tryton.org/modules/stock/file/0f6d3b754d7c/move.py#l546
http://hg.tryton.org/modules/account_stock_continental/file/cba1300f048b/product.py#l271
http://hg.tryton.org/modules/production/file/3eea8c2eb0c7/production.py#l294
http://hg.tryton.org/modules/production/file/3eea8c2eb0c7/production.py#l426
But I agree it is a little bit complex to remove the required from the
template but it is not unsolvable.
--
Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpELjE4nXSEc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
