On 13 Sep 13:31, Dominique Chabord wrote: > 2014-09-13 0:28 GMT+02:00 David Bruchmann <[email protected]>: > > Concerning Dominiques comment "I've never seen, up to now, a sane use > > of multi-company", this can't be measure for Tryton as long as > > multi-companies exist. > > Multi-company was designed for tiynyerp 4.2 by Camptocamp for some > historical and internal reasons, as a quick and dirty project.
I did not remember why I implemented the record rules :-) > It was > then supported by Openerp-sa. Since then I had to know about many > failures in delivering it and not about any success. > If you know about a correct (reliable accounting, safe isolation, > etc...) of a multi-company solution, either Tryton or Openerp, please > let us know and I will revise my standpoint. It is an open discussion. For the record, we fixed a lot of those issues in Tryton but now we face some design issues which prevents to solve them. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpIbJGVEDJgR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
