2014-09-12 17:55 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: >> - I know of a project for a cooperative company for which a >> verticalization has been done; This used similar approach to >> multi-company, but it was not multi-company > > And what was it?
It was based on access rules as multi-company. > >> - I get sometimes the requirement for "multi-branding" business which >> make the company appear under different brands depending on the >> channel. > > That's just about customization of report/header etc. as a minimal definition, yes in real life, it is a bit more complex because content of the document has to take it into account. > >> Multi-company has been a big reason of failure for many projects where >> it just cannot fit. >> - Group level reports are the worst reason to do it. > > Can you explain "Group reports"? -reporting at the head of a group of companies > >> - Shared operations (one sells, one buys) just cannot be done with it. > > Can you ellaborate? nothing new in this thread. Multi-company is not the rght solution for intercompany business. >
