On 2017-07-04 15:07, Khurram Shahzad wrote: > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Cédric Krier <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2017-07-04 10:20, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote: > > > El 04/07/17 a les 06:45, Khurram Shahzad ha escrit: > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > I have set default 'Account Receivable' and 'Account Payable' for > > Party > > > > through Account Configuration. > > > > > > > > It was working fine as long as we were running financial operations of > > > > our hospital. Now there is a requirement to run the finances of our > > > > Medical College through the same system. And, we want to manage the > > > > receivables and payables from the college students separately from the > > > > hospital patients. > > > > > > > > We have opened separate Accounts for both being 'Receivables from > > > > Students' and 'Receivables from Patients'. > > > > > > > > How can I cater this situation? > > > > > > > > Doesn't it make sense to have separate account configurations for each > > > > business/company being managed? > > > > > > When you craete a Student, you should modify it's accounts values to use > > > the correct one. > > > > But what happens if the Student is also a Patient? > > > The receivables/payables of a person who is Student and Patient should not > be mixed/combined. That's another problem which we are facing as each > company has its own customers & suppliers whose accounts must be managed > separately, Thus, I believe the parties of one company should not be > visible to parties of another company. > > We have 30,000 registered patients and just 700 students. But, when we > create a fee invoice for student, we have to search from 30700 parties. > Rather, add the vendors/suppliers of both companies too in this list! > > For me, it is not clear if it should be two separate accounting so it > > should use multi-company or two separate instances. > > Or if it is the same accounting and just some kind of operations should > > be put on a specific receivable/payable account. This last one sounds > > very strange and cumbersome for me. Indeed it looks like a kind of > > analytic reporting which should be done with analytic accounting. But > > still usually analytic accounting is done on Income Statement accounts > > and not on the Balance Sheet accounts. > > > > The management wants separate Trial Balance, Income Statement and Balance > Sheet for both the companies and also an accumulated/aggregated Income and > Balance Sheet. They also have separate finance teams for every company and > do not want the accounts of one company visible to other company's finance > team. > > So, what's the way forward?
Run two different instances of trytond on two different databases. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/20170704101951.GW3534%40kei.
