(Jul 14 2005 07:53) Brian Wilson wrote: > > I had the TSL 3 installation fail with 5 interfaces, one 3com and two > dual-port Intels. 'Fail' in this case means the installer locked up > with a python error complaining about eth4. Pulled the dual-port > cards, re-ran installer, everything was fine, put them back in and > configured manually after install. > > Sorry I can't re-test later, I had to put the boards into > a production system.
We'll set up a test system with more cards then. No problems, and thanks for your report. > The Viper installer does not really seem better than Anaconda to me, > just different. I am willing to accept there are a thousand internal > improvements if you say so. There are a thousand internal improvements. Seriously: I ( being highly objective in the matter ;) find the navigation to be easier, and the menus a bit more intuitive. I really like the ability to skip steps you don't want to change. I hope people that install many systems and reinstall often will feel the same way. Also, I'm satisfied it has reached this level of quality this fast. The development of the next version happens in parallell with the bugfix maintainance of the current version. Next version targets stability of code, code cleanup, documentation, improved partition module and kickstart, and will hopefully reach the level of maturity more seasoned installers have soon after its release. kind regards c -- Christian H. Toldnes Trustix Developer _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
