Mark Chatterton wrote: > Hi All, > I've been using 2.2 for a while now and I'm very happy with it > but I'm looking at setting up a server for a friend who runs a small > production company (5 users). With the list below should i stick with > 2.2 & upgrade later to 3 or start with 3.0 now. Has anyone had issues > implementing any of the following on 3.0?
Ignoring your list of requirements completely, I'll simply answer the main question, 2.2 versus 3.0: 3.0 is not stable at this moment. By this I don't mean that it will crash, but the package selection and the versions of most of the packages will change much more frequently in 3.0 than in 2.2. 3.0 will in time morph into 3.1, which will in time morph into 3.2. The 3.2 version will have package changes in the same frequency as 2.2 has today. So the real question is: "How important is this server? Will someone monitor the upgrades, and make sure everything is fine all the time?" If the answer is "It's important and/or nobody will monitor the updates." you should stick with 2.2. If the answer is "It's not that important and/or I will always monitor the updates." then do whatever seems easiest. c -- Christian H. Toldnes Trustix Developer _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
