maybe we take this offline, since it isn't tsl related, if anybody wants to take part drop me a line, and i cc whatever is said. m
On 21.10.2005, at 13:31, Jaroslav Vrbicky wrote: > > .... > I would recommend installing dansguardian + > clamav for safer browsing (as was mentioned in original post) for even > one seat (but not dansguardian alone)... To keep Squid + DG + > ClamAV up > to date is not actually that critical. The core of this (Squid and > ClamAV) can be handled by swup and therefore kept up to date. ok, haven't thought about the virii issue, but isn't it easier to block what is considered harmful via squid acls, I have seen DG only in environments where parents/bosses want to restrict surfing, not so much as a security resource. squid+clamav seems to me more of a security solution. > The only downside I can see now, is that DG > can't simply block individual local user using time restrictions as > Squid does... So, that's my point of view on this one ;-). I try to understand your point, but I think I don't get it completely. you advocate DansGuardian as replacement for squid acls, or just because it can do keyword filter? matthias _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
